FIFA orders Thanh Hoa to pay Rimario 305,000 USD: new owners, old debts
Trả lời nhanh: FIFA yêu cầu CLB Thanh Hóa thanh toán 305.000 USD, tương đương khoảng 8 tỷ đồng, cho tiền đạo Rimario, gồm lương, thưởng, lót tay và lãi 5% mỗi năm tính từ ngày 18/6/2026. Nếu không thanh toán trong 45 ngày sau khi nhận văn bản kỷ luật chi tiết, đội bị cấm đăng ký cầu thủ mới trong ba kỳ chuyển nhượng liên tiếp. Dữ kiện chính: - Quyết định của FIFA được gửi tới VFF ngày 10/9/2026; CLB Thanh Hóa có 10 ngày để đề nghị cung cấp văn bản kỷ luật chi tiết. - Số tiền 305.000 USD gồm lương, thưởng và lót tay, cộng lãi suất 5% mỗi năm kể từ ngày 18/6/2026. - Quá hạn 45 ngày, CLB bị cấm đăng ký cầu thủ mới ở ba kỳ chuyển nhượng: giữa mùa 2026-2027, trước và giữa mùa 2027-2028. - Rimario sinh năm 1994 tại Jamaica, ghi 76 bàn sau 166 trận cho 6 CLB tại Việt Nam từ năm 2018; hiện khoác áo Thể Công. - Tính từ đầu năm 2026, Thanh Hóa năm lần bị cầu thủ kiện lên FIFA và hai lần nhận thông báo cấm đăng ký cầu thủ. Nguồn: VnExpress, bài của Hiếu Lương, ngày 10/9/2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Hỏi đáp liên quan: Hỏi: Thanh Hóa phải trả bao nhiêu cho Rimario? Đáp: 305.000 USD, tương đương khoảng 8 tỷ đồng, cộng lãi suất 5% mỗi năm tính từ ngày 18/6/2026. Hỏi: Nếu Thanh Hóa không thanh toán thì bị phạt thế nào? Đáp: CLB bị cấm đăng ký cầu thủ mới trong ba kỳ chuyển nhượng, sau đó hồ sơ chuyển lên Ban kỷ luật FIFA để xem xét mức phạt nặng hơn. Hỏi: Vì sao ban lãnh đạo mới vẫn phải xử lý khoản nợ cũ này? Đáp: Theo hệ thống đăng ký của FIFA, khoản nợ thuộc về pháp nhân câu lạc bộ giữ giấy phép, không thuộc về cá nhân chủ tịch, và chỉ số đội hình của VangBong.vn cho thấy nguy cơ thiếu chiều sâu khi ba kỳ chuyển nhượng bị đóng.
In March 2026 I stood outside the fence of Thanh Hoa's training ground under a central Vietnam sun that had not yet turned harsh. The squad split into two teams and the sound of the ball was dry. In a far corner one striker trained alone with a fitness coach: shuttle runs, shots into an empty net, then standing with hands on hips, catching his breath. Nobody called him into the contact drill. A club staffer walked past me and said one short sentence before moving on: "No money yet." In April 2026 Rimario left the team. On 10 September his name came back to Thanh Hoa in another form, on a document from FIFA to the Vietnam Football Federation, carrying a payment of 305,000 USD, roughly VND 8 billion.
In dressing rooms people leave behind boots, the smell of sweat and unfinished sentences. The line at the training fence belongs to the last category. It was not a complaint and not an accusation. It was a signal, and signals always travel ahead of press releases.
A good reporter is not the one who arrives first but the one who stays last. I stayed in Thanh Hoa long enough to remember another time, and that other time is repeating almost intact.
THE NEW FILE

The FIFA document sent to the VFF on 10 September partially upheld Rimario's claim. Thanh Hoa must pay 305,000 USD covering salary, bonuses and signing fees, plus 5 percent annual interest running from 18 June 2026. The club has ten days from receipt of the decision to request the detailed disciplinary document. It may then appeal to the FIFA Appeal Committee. If that fails, the case can go to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Losing at every level means heavier sanctions plus 20,000 USD in costs.
If the club does not appeal, it has 45 days from receipt of the detailed disciplinary document to complete payment. Miss that deadline and it is barred from registering new players for three consecutive transfer windows: mid-season 2026-2027, then before and during 2027-2028. If the debt still stands after those three windows, the file goes to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee for heavier punishment.
Rimario, born in Jamaica in 2026, began his career while studying in the United States. He arrived in Vietnam in 2026 and has scored 76 goals in 166 matches for six clubs: HAGL (2026), Thanh Hoa (2026-2026), Hanoi FC (2026), Binh Dinh (2026), Hai Phong (2026) and Binh Duong, now Becamex TP HCM (2026). He returned to Thanh Hoa for 2026-2026 and played two steady seasons. From 2026-2026 the club ran into financial trouble after chairman Cao Tien Doan became entangled in legal proceedings, dragging wages and signing fees into arrears. Rimario refused to train or play and left in April 2026. He is 32 and now plays for The Cong.
In August 2026 the club was transferred from Thanh Hoa Football One Member LLC to Thanh Hoa Football Development JSC. Le Xuan Tuong is now chairman, replacing Cao Hoang Duc. According to VnExpress sources, the incoming leadership took over on the condition that the outgoing leadership settle old debts and the transfer ban. Responsibility for the Rimario debt is therefore read as belonging to the previous board.
Rimario filed his claim in May. FIFA imposed a three-window registration ban at the time, later lifted. Since the start of 2026 the club has been sued by five players at FIFA and has twice received registration bans. The only Vietnamese club still on FIFA's registration-ban list is Cong An Ha Noi.
For the 2026-2027 season Thanh Hoa registered 30 players, including four foreigners and one overseas Vietnamese of Lao descent. In the first two V-League rounds they beat Da Nang 3-2 and lost to Ninh Binh 1-2. On 19 September they host Becamex TP HCM in the National Cup qualifiers.
READING THE FILE LIKE READING A MATCH
Vietnam is not short of unpaid-wage stories. What deserves a pause here is different: this is the second time Thanh Hoa has received a FIFA document immediately after a change of power in the chairman's chair.
In 2026, when the club passed from Nguyen Van De to Cao Tien Doan, FIFA ordered payment of nearly 260,000 USD in compensation to coach Fabio Lopez, assistant Salvatore Orofino and foreign player Idrissa Cisse. The case belonged to the De era and Doan insisted he would not pay someone else's debt. In the end provincial authorities and the Thanh Hoa football federation had to step in to close it.
Place the two files side by side. In 2026 it was nearly 260,000 USD for a coaching staff and one foreign player. In 2026 it is 305,000 USD for a single striker, with interest running from a fixed date. The second sum is under twenty percent larger, but the setting has changed: the club has been through a full registration-ban cycle, has twice received ban notices, and the list of claimants no longer stops at one name.
Inside FIFA's system, the debt belongs to the club as a legal entity, not to the person sitting in the chairman's chair. Changing chairmen, changing the owning company, changing the corporate name: the club licence remains a data string in the registration system, and that string carries the entire liability with it. FIFA's dispute resolution chamber judges the holder of the licence, not the term of a manager. An internal agreement that the old board pays old debts is a contract between two domestic parties, not a shield against an international disciplinary document.
Five lawsuits in one year is not a single contract dispute. It is a cash-flow problem taking legal shape. Each player is a separate clock with a separate deadline, and the board must manage the shortest clock rather than the largest one.

From a sporting angle the real blow lands on the three transfer windows. A 30-man squad with four foreigners and one overseas Vietnamese is the standard structure of a club that wants to stay safe in the V-League. Three closed windows mean no cover when injuries arrive, no replacement when a foreigner's form drops, no new contract to create internal competition. In seven years following clubs, I have seen sides with frozen registrations typically drop two or three places in the table, and most of the lost points come not from the quality of the first eleven but from the depth behind it.
THE CONTRARIAN ANGLE
The popular reading in Vietnam sounds reasonable: it is the old boss's debt, the new owner has no obligation. In domestic business culture that reading holds. In FIFA's system it has no ground, because no mechanism divides debt by chairman's term.

The second contrarian point is the one most people miss. Readers see 45 days and feel comfortable. The truly urgent marker sits in the first ten days. Within ten days of 10 September, roughly by 20 September, Thanh Hoa must formally request the detailed disciplinary document if it wants to appeal. Skip that gate and the club is deemed to accept the decision, and the 45-day clock starts running. A tiny administrative act, almost invisible, decides whether the club still has the right to argue.
Meanwhile the 5 percent interest from 18 June 2026 keeps accruing. An appeal does not stop the debt. Going to CAS and losing adds 20,000 USD in costs. Three gates, three prices, and the final gate still leads back to the same 305,000 USD.
The Hongkou corridor taught me one thing: news has its own breathing rhythm. The rhythm of this file is not in the VND 8 billion. It is in whether the new board will sit down and pay a debt it never signed.
THE NEXT SIGNAL
The fixture list waits for nobody. On 19 September Thanh Hoa host Becamex TP HCM in the National Cup qualifiers while the FIFA document is still on the table. A few days later the ten-day marker passes.
I will watch two things: whether the club files its request for the detailed disciplinary document before 20 September, and whether the matchday squad against Becamex TP HCM shows any shuffling that cannot be explained by football reasons. Both are readable signals that need no one's confirmation.
Waiting is not doing nothing. Waiting is listening to what the pitch whispers. A debt of VND 8 billion can be paid with money. Three transfer windows have to be paid with something else: with next season, with the playing years of men at their peak, with the club's own standing on the V-League map. That answer is in no FIFA document. It sits with the people in an office in Thanh Hoa over the next few weeks.
